A Short History of Science and Religion
PDF Print E-mail
Articles

Ernie Stokely 9-25-2007

Flemmish WoodcutHow did science and religion come to the current state of affairs where there are sharp disagreements about things like the teaching of evolution and the permission to do stem cell research? These pages are presented as a very brief overview of the history of science and religion. There are many links off of the SPAFER site that will take you to more detailed discussions of the brief summary presented here. This writing is not presented as being complete by any means, and by design selects those names and events that might best give a flavor to the complete historical story. Also, this writing chronicles the history of science and primarily Christianity. The stories of Judaism and Islam are not covered in detail except as they impact the science-Christianity story. These histories can be found on the Web using key words and a Google search. This presentation has been made to Sunday school classes at Vestavia Hills United Methodist Church and St. Luke's Episcopal Church in Birmingham, Alabama.

Imagine yourself sitting around a campfire 15-20,000 years ago somewhere in the area of Mesopotamia. Look to the sky ablaze with stars without light and air pollution. (Have you ever been out West on a cold winter's night away from light pollution and looked up? It is truly a wondrous sight not to be forgotten!)

The ancients were equally humbled by the night sky, by the rising and setting of the sun and moon, the change of the seasons, etc. The human mind wants to try and understand, to rationalize its surroundings. Thus, our species was led to postulate the presence of mystical beings, a god or gods who had powers beyond those of the human. There is no time here to talk about the evolution of our god concepts, but I heartily recommend to you Karen Armstrong's book, The History of God. God concepts have evolved over the millennia. According to Armstrong, very ancient humans that preceded the Hebrew tribes had a monotheistic God called the Sky God (monotheism is ancient), but this god was apparently so remote he/she was replaced by more accessible multiple gods, and polytheism became the norm. (One of the more popular was a female goddess called Great Mother. Sadly, the female component of our current God model was lost somewhere toward the end of the Middle Ages ... but that is another story!) Monotheistic god notions leading to our current monotheistic god of the Abrahamic religions re-emerged starting about 14,000 years ago. Read Armstrong's book to find out more about this interesting evolution.

Cosmology of the Bible – Science began as an observational (no experimental evidence) description of the observable cosmos, i.e., the sky and the earth. In the Bronze and Iron Ages the sky was thought to be a thin dome containing the stars.  In the Old Testament, God was in the sky surrounded by angels and stars (I Kings 22:19; II Chronicles 18:18). The earth was flat as well and was the center of the known universe, with all stars and planets thought to be moving around the earth. The waters contained all kinds of mythical creatures (see passages in Psalms and elsewhere). Hell was below the earth somewhere, and is depicted differently in different beliefs and in different parts of the Bible. There is little in the New Testament to suggest what the writers believed about the cosmos of their times, but the scant evidence suggests that they either rejected or did not know about the Greek contributions to astronomy, and that they continued to believe the Old Testament stories about the universe. You can read more about Biblical cosmology in Wikipedia here or for more on cosmologies in other religions, see here.

sombrerogalaxy

Modern Cosmology - Let's quickly jump to the present and take a very fast romp through some humbling facts from what we currently know about the universe that we can observe (much of our universe is not observable by us). If we take a string 10 feet long and let it represent the roughly 15 billion years since the "big bang," we see that about 2/3 way down the string (4.8 billion years ago) we have the creation of our galaxy and the coalescence of our planet Earth. Just a short billion years later we have evidence of the first simple single-cell life forms. These were probably archaebacteria that developed around fumaroles in the deep ocean. Life had evolved on earth! That is just eight inches down the 10' string from the formation of the earth. So, it took about a billion years of chemical experiments on the earth for life to evolve. It was just a wink in time ago, or only about 235 million years (less than two inches on the string from the present!) when the dinosaurs roamed the earth.

So, where is our species, homo sapiens, on this scale? How much distance on the string would we occupy? Well, if you take the time on the earth of our species to be about 50,000 years when our current species is thought to have become distinctly evolved from our nearest primate ancestor, we occupy a distance of 1/2 the width of a human hair on our 15 foot string!! We are indeed so very, very recent on the planet.

Our galaxy, the Milky Way, a modest galaxy as galaxies go, is over 100,000 light years across. That is the distance light would travel going at 186,000 miles per second in 100,000 years! In our galaxy there are estimated to be over 400 billion stars. Yet, there are 125 billion galaxies in the observable universe. This means there are over 5,000 billion billion estimated stars in the observable universe, more stars than there are grains of sand on all the beaches on the entire planet Earth!

Now let me give you some science factoids at the micro scale. Our spiral DNA molecule (see here for scientific details), composed of nucleic acid base pairs connected together in a spiral, is present in every cell and contains the code to make any cell in our body. Every living cell on the planet, be it bacteria, animal, or plant, has roughtly the same kind of biochemical machinery in its cell(s). There are 3.2 billion base pairs in the human genome, yet there are over 4,000 known diseases that are caused by an error in a single base pair. The human genome contains 23 chromosomes and about 20,000-25,000 genes (each gene codes for one or more proteins), as do most mammals. Plants have 40,000-50,000 genes (more than us marvelous humans ... isn't that interesting?), mice also have about 20,000 genes; in the nematode (C. elegans) that feasts on the roots of my tomato plants each summer, the number is around 19 000; in a yeast cell (S. cerevisiae) that rises our bread there are approximately 6,000 genes; and the microbe responsible for tuberculosis has around 4,000. 97% of the human genome does not code for a protein and we are just now beginning the process of understanding the function of this part of the genome. Between humans, our DNA differs by only 0.2 per cent, or 1 in 500 base pairs. Finally, human DNA is 99.1 per cent identical to chimpanzees. Can there be much doubt about our evolution from the flora and fauna of the past?

The Ancient World

Babylonian TabletWe in the West have been taught that all of the science we have today was developed by the Greeks. Through work in the last 50 years we now know that we owe almost all of the roots of modern science and the roots of Greek science to developments in India, China, and the Arab lands, developments that predated the Greeks. The Greeks did indeed carry forward many of the ideas and laid the foundations for our modern philosophy, physics, metaphysics, and mathematics, but they already had learned much from the world surrounding Greece.

For example, Babylonian mathematics in 3000 BCE ("before common era", or more commonly, "BC", or "before Christ") had developed a number system, or a "place system," based on the base 60. Our modern number system is based on 10 (the decimal system). Around 2000 BCE the astronomers of Mesopotamia used tables with squares of numbers, a system that came much, much later in the West. In 1800 BCE the Egyptians used equations to deal with food distribution. Even the earliest recording of the creation story came from India around 2000 BCE and was recorded in the Rig-veda, which evolved into Hinduism. More about the contributions of the non-Greek scientists can be found in the paperback, Lost Discoveries, by Dick Teresi.

The Abrahamic Genesis story was first written down around 1400-1200 BCE (before it was oral tradition), and around 1000 BCE the Sumarians and Babylonians were using a sophisticated algebra, millennia before algebra was introduced in Egypt and Greece by Hero of Alexandria.

The Greek Era and the Beginning Disagreements between Science and Religion

PtolemyThe Greek Contribution - The Greeks indeed contributed much to modern science, and they kicked off the first recorded confrontations between the natural science of their time and Greek religion. Around 750 BCE the Greek story of creation came into being in the form of a number of gods that were a part of Greek mythology. Greek mythology makes for some very "R-rated" reading, and it is suggested that you read about the unabridged stories of the cavorting of the Greek gods late at night after the children are in bed!

The rise of modern science and mathematics in the “western world” was heralded by the development of the beginnings of mathematics around 600  BCE. In 335 BCE Aristotle was born. He, Archimedes, Socrates, Plato, and others laid the foundation of modern philosophy and contributed of the earliest writings on physics, metaphysics, poetry (including theater), logic, rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology and zoology. They also caused the first rift between religion and science by attacking mysticism and the religion of the times based on mythology. They called for thought based on reason rather than mysticism.

In the second century (150) CE, Ptolemy, a North African astronomer, created an astronomical canon that incorporated ideas of Aristotle (the orbits of the planets and the sun were thought to be circular and contained in concentric spheres around the earth). This planetary system orbiting the earth at its center was called the "geocentric" system and was the accepted system by the early Christian church as the one created by God. It was not questioned until centuries later by Copernicus.

What's the Big Deal With Cosmology? - Why all this fuss about astronomy and cosmology? Well, religion (which preceded science) contained mythologies regarding the early understanding of astronomy, the stars, the planets, etc., and it contained stories about the creation of the universe. The priests, popes, and bishops who controlled the early (Christian) Church took these stories literally, since they were believed by most everyone. However, as more and more became known through scientific methods of astronomy and careful observation, the viewpoints of scientific cosmology and Biblical cosmology (and the official interpretations sanctioned by the Church) began to differ. Cosmology was the first arena of science for a disagreement with the Church. Others were to follow later.

Augustine

The Rise of Christianity

Early Christianity has a rich history between 0 and 400 CE ("common era," or AD, or "after death"). It will not be covered in this short presentation, but more detail can be found here.The great theologian, Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), authored a number of treatises that become the foundation of modern Christian theology. He was heavily influenced by Platonism (Plato: 427-347 BCE), NeoPlatonism, and Stoicism, and brought Greek influence into Christian theology at this point. However, he missed much of Greek natural philosophy (such as works by Aristotle) and insisted on basing Christian theology on faith rather than reason. The main cause of this omission was the few scholars in the Roman empire who could read and write Greek. Thus, so much of Greek science and philosophy was lost to Roman scholars for centuries to come.

The Decline - The "Dark" and Middle Ages

Ibn HaithemThe Invasion - The Germanic tribes from northern and eastern Europe began to overrun the Roman Empire in around 400-500 CE. This started a decline in learning as people fled the cities and abandoned many of the developments of society that were in evidence during the height of the Roman Empire.

The Attempt to Preserve Learning - Between roughly 400 -1400 CE we have what are called the Middle Ages. During this time learning was kept alive in the Christian monasteries (abbots, priories, hermitages, etc.), but only the science that was written in Latin was preserved. Again, there were few that could read or write Greek.

Universities began to appear across Europe and Great Britain during this time (in Oxford, Bologna, Paris, e.g.).

The Great Islamic Handoff! - Although the Roman Empire was uneducated in the Greek language, not so with the Islamic world. Islamic scholars not only transcribed the Greek science into their own language, they carried forward the science and made their own contributions (see Teresi's book, Lost Discoveries, for more details or go here for more details). In fact, the period 700 - 1400 CE is known as the Islamic Golden Age. Beginning in about the 13th century or so, the science that had been nurtured by Islamic scientists began to make its way back into Western Europe ... across the Pyrenees from the Moors in Spain and from documentation from the Christian crusaders returning from the Middle East. The Renaissance was beginning to bloom in Europe as knowledge began to once again grow and new thinking began to flourish.

Unfortunately, Islamic science began a decline about that time - between the 10th and 13th centuries - due to several reasons, but primarily due to conservative and restrictive interpretations of the Qur'an and a turn from thought-based on reason to thought based on strict beliefs. That situation persists today in some sects of Islam.

The Rise of Science - The Enlightenment in Astronomy

Copernicus

The Trouble Begins with Copernicus - Nicolaus Copernicus was born in the Kingdom of Poland in 1473. His handbook, On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres, was revolutionary in its time. It was the first open suggestion in more "modern" times that the planets revolved around the sun, rather than the earth. This is known as a "heliocentric" system, rather than the "geocentric" system discussed earlier where the planets and the sun revolve around the earth.

Heliocentric WoodcutEarlier traces of a heliocentric model are found in several anonymous Vedic Sanskrit texts composed in ancient India before the 7th century BCE. Additionally, the Indian astronomer and mathematician Aryabhata anticipated elements of Copernicus' work by over a thousand years. Aristarchus of Samos in the 3rd century BCE elaborated some theories of Heraclides Ponticus (the daily rotation of the Earth on its axis, the revolution of Venus and Mercury around the Sun) to propose what was the first scientific model of a heliocentric solar system: the Earth and all other planets revolving around the Sun, the Earth rotating around its axis daily, the Moon in turn revolving around the Earth once a month.

Copernicus circulated his theories mainly to his friends, and was too fearful of persecution by the church to publish his works widely. They did, however catch the eyes of Martin Luther, Johannes Kepler, Tyco Brahe, and Galileo Galilei.

The Rise of Science - The Enlightenment by Great Scientists and Philosophers

Johannes Kepler and Tyco Brahe - Two great astronomers lived during the 16th century. Johannes Kepler was a German astronomer born in Swabia in the south of Germany. Tyco BraheTyco Brahe was a colorful Danish nobleman who lived in what is now called Sweden.

Tyco Brahe was once out drinking with friends as a 20-year old. He got into an argument and wound up getting his nose cut off in a duel. For the remainder of his life he wore a copper nose prosthesis. He is also reported to have had a pet moose which somehow drank too much beer during a party and feel down onto the floor and died. It is not known why he was in the house. Tyco Brahe was indeed a colorful fellow! He was also a very bright scholar and astronomer who was determined to provide a compromise between the heliocentric system proposed by Copernicus and the geocentric system maintained by the church. So, he advanced a theory that the sun and moon rotate around the earth, while the remainder of the planets rotate around the sun. The resulting system tied mathematicians and astronomers in knots for years until Brahe's theory was finally disproved. However, the Church was convinced that his speculations were correct, and they adopted his combination planetary system.

Meanwhile, Johannes Kepler tried in vain to convince Brahe that he was wrong, and that the Copernican heliocentric system was indeed correct. In fact, Kepler even figured out the ellipical orbits of the planets and laid the foundations for the careful observations later by Galileo. Remember, there were no telescopes yet in the 16th century. 

lutherMatin Luther Weighs In - In 1483, Martin Luther was born. Luther, of course, was responsible for the Reformation. As we shall see later, it caused a splintering of the Roman Catholic church that was to indirectly widen the riff between science and religion. Luther also categorically rejected the Copernican system of planetary motion, and supported the geocentric system of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Rise of Science - Galileo, Newton, and Kant

GalileoGalileo Galilei - Galileo Galilei was born in 1564, and lived his life in the later throws of the Reformation. The bloody 30 Years War that racked Europe in the 17th century was fought during his later years. The Roman Church, in no mood for tolerating heretics, had instituted the first inquisitions in the 12th century. These continued through Galileo's time. Galileo, born in Roman Catholic Italy, could be said to be born at the wrong place and the wrong time in history.

Galileo did brilliant work in a number of fields of science including physics, mathematics, philosophy, and astronomy. It was his careful observations and keen thinking in astronomy, however, that got him into trouble. He built the first telescope (invented in Holland), and stubbornly believed that the church would accept his conclusions about the heliocentric nature of the solar system and his agreement with Copernicus' earlier speculations.

Alas, the church was in no mood at this point in history to tolerate the contradictory views of a lay person, not even the famous Galileo Galilei! He spent the last 10 years of his life under house arrest and narrowly escaped death and being condemned as a heretic of the Church. It took over 400 years for the Catholic Church to forgive Galileo. Only in October of 1992 did Pope John Paul II officially forgive Galileo and express regret for the way things had been handled in the mid-17th century. Wow.

Isaac Newton - On the year that Galileo died (1642), Isaac Newton was born in Protestant England into a lower income family. Newton was a very bright child, although as an adult he had a somewhat egotistical personality. After finishing his education he received a faculty post at Oxford. In 1664 he was sent home due to an outbreak of the plague in England. There he had time away from his professorial duties to study in his garden, observe the falling of the apple from the tree, ponder issues of gravity, mathematics, and write down his ideas. It was during this year most of his founding ideas in astronomy, physics, and mathematics were developed. His foundational document was Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (in Latin), a pillar of science to follow. Would this have happened if Newton had not had his sabbatical away from the plague?

Newton was a Unitarian and he rejected Trinitarian theology. This became known at Oxford, and he was held back from advancement because of his religious views.

The Rise of Science - The Ages of Reason and Enlightenment

HuxleyImmanuel Kant (1724-1804) – Born in East Prussia and a giant of philosophical thinking, Immanuel Kant defined "enlightenment" toward the end of the 18th century, the late period of the Age of Enlightenment. He also ushered in the 19th century and its rich period of new ideas and discoveries. He wrote that one could not know if there was a God, but one could also not know there was not a God. He tried to reconcile faith and science basically by separating the two. Kant felt the focus should be on human relationships and not on the natural world, which he considered inscrutable.

DarwinThe 19th Century - The Ferment of Ideas - Charles Darwin 1809-1882 No one in history more than Charles Darwin influenced the rift between religion and science. The 5th of 6 children, he was born into a  family of means. He was sent to Cambridge to study for the ministry after being a failure at studying for medicine. Charles' professor had been offered a globe-circling trip on the 100 foot boat, the Beagle, but was unable to accept. He offered the trip to Charles. At first his family forbade him to go, but his uncle persuaded the family to support Charles in the voyage. He was seasick the entire five years of the trip. Charles’s mother was a Wedgwood (of the famous pottery-making family), and Charles eventually married Emma Wedgwood, his 1st cousin. Origin of the Species was his blockbuster book, but Descent of Man was his exposition on anthropology and the evolution of the human species. Darwin believed in God, and did not see a conflict between religion and his work, although he clearly understood the dissension between the Church and his work that followed.

The Philosophers and Theologians - Only a small sample of the ground-breaking and original thinking of the 19th century will be presented here. David Strauss (1808-1874) dared to suggest that the stories surrounding Jesus's life and work did not derive from actual events but had resulted from an Old Testament mythological tradition. Theology in the 19th century became diverse and sometimes contentious. For example, Charles Hodge (1797-1878), Professor of Theology at Princeton, wrote simply that Darwinism was atheism.

 Thomas HuxleyThomas Huxley (1825-1895) wrote treatises supporting the theory of evolution, even though he had doubts about Darwin's ideas of natural selection and gradualism. He enlarged evolutionary thinking to include ideas about human evolution and distinction between human races and genders. Huxley considered himself an agnostic. Almost totally self-schooled, Huxley made contributions not only in areas of thinking about evolution, he made large contributions to biology.

The 20th and 21st Centuries- Rise of Fundamentalism, Evangelicalism, and Progressiveism

Albert Einstein - Before moving to religious movements of the last century, no discussion of science Einstein and religion would be complete without at least mentioning Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Einstein was born of Jewish parents, but was never a practicing Jew during his lifetime. Throughout his life Einstein believed in God, but not a god who intercedes into the daily physics of the universe. Einstein's great contribution was, of course, his ideas on relativity. These notions have had tremendous impact on the understanding of basic physics, and in fact upset many of the tenets set down by Newton. Einstein never liked quantum mechanics, yet his early work set the stage for the development of this branch of physics. At the quantum level strange random events occur, and "communication" takes place instantaneously across large distances. To the lay person, the quantum world remains shrouded in mystery. His work powerfully drove home the inadequacy of ancient religious understandings of science, and it forced religious believers to examine even more deeply their own god theology and their reconciliation between modern science and religion.

The Rise of Fundamentalism  - In the 19th century there were two significant movements in Christianity that would be played out in the coming centuries - conservatism and liberalism. Liberalism in particular adopted many of the ideas from the philosophy of the times, and rejected the more orthodox teachings of Christianity. Finally, in the 20th century some Christians had had enough. They set out to formalize what it meant to be a Christian. Fundamentalism was born in the 1920s. Theologians at the conservative Princeton Theological Seminary played a role in this movement with their writings. In 1909, Lyman Steward, a businessman and Christian philanthropist, wrote a 12-volume series called The Fundamentals. This series of books became the foundation for the fundamentalist movement in the United States. Fundamentalists belong to all the major Christian denominations, and fundamentalism exists in all of the major religions today (especially troubling is the current Islamic fundamentalism and its beliefs regarding the lack of sanctity of human life). The fundamentalist belief often assumes the Bible is inerrant; hence, the fundamentalist cosmology follows that of the Iron and Bronze age understanding of the Bible. For example, fundamentalists may believe that the earth was formed as recently as 4,000 years ago. Evolution is rejected out of hand. The experimentation with stem cells is also another point of departure between many fundamentalists and scientists. There are many points of disagreement withscientific findings.

Evangelicalism is often confused with fundamentalism, although the two movements share some common characteristics. Evangelicalism is often characterized by Biblical inerrancy, and this causes conflicts between evangelicals and modern science.

Progressive Christianity is a relative new movement that can be considered to be a branch off of liberal Christianity of the 19th century. Progressive Christians have a metaphorical understanding of the Bible, and attempt to reconcile modern science with their Christian beliefs.

There are a number of late 20th century and early 21st century writers on the subject of religion and science, many of them having a negative view toward religion. These include Richard Dawkins, Steven Weinberg, Sam Harris, and many others. There are also progressive Christian writers, as well as many writers with a more fundamentalist viewpoint.

The Argument Over the Creation - Conservative and fundamentalist Christians reject the evolutionary and "big bang" stories of the history of the planet, and insist on adhering to the Biblical stories of the creation (there are two of them) in Genesis. "Creationism" is a word that has been coined to describe the process whereby God created the universe in 7 days. Scientists were content to let religious believers have the right to believe in creationism until they began in intercede in the schools and change the way science was taught to children. Scientists became alarmed and felt that this jeopardized the scientific future and competitiveness of the U.S. in the world economy. Thus, there have been bitter, vocal outbreaks between the two camps over the creation story. "Intelligent design" is another way to suggest that God interceded into the evolutionary process by laying out the design of life found in nature. Scientists reject this theory as well, and consider it a threat to an enlightened, modern understanding of biology, cosmology, and the other natural sciences. This battle still rages in the United States.

Personal Theologies of God

People who come to SPAFER meetings have many understandings of God. Some are atheists and do not believe there is an entity such as God. Others are agnostics. What one comes to believe about God is a personal conclusion that results from a personal search. However, one's god theology has everything to do with one's ability to reconcile religion and science.

Sky

Only a very brief summary will be given here. Go to the links to read more about these theologies, many of which are very complex. Theologies that bear on the issue:

Theism – The ideas embedded in theism go back to the 16th century, but is still a primary God theology, especially in modern U.S. churches. In theism, God is an omnipotent entity that intercedes into the modern world (divine intervention), sometimes suspending the laws of nature by. A belief in a theistic god makes reconciliation with modern science very difficult.

Deism – Deists believe that God created the world and the natural laws, but does not interfere with the process in the present. Many scientists who still hold onto a belief in God have this model of God. It is compatible with modern science since there is no divine intervention.

Atheism – Many scientists, if not most, consider themselves to be atheists. There are more kinds of atheism than you might expect! See the link to the left to explore more. Atheism is compatible with modern science.

Agnosticism – Agnosticism is a belief that the existence of God cannot be proved, but the possibility for God to exist is left open. Many scientists share this belief. It is compatible with modern science.

Pantheism – Pantheists believe that God and the universe are synonymous, i.e., God is in and is everything. Pantheism is compatible with modern science.

Panentheism – Panentheists believe God is all that is in the universe, but is more, is the source of universal truth, and that God will likely always be beyond human understanding. Panentheism is compatible with modern science.

Process theology – Process theology plays a large role in the underpinnings of pantheism and especially panentheism. Process theology describes a God that is not omnipotent, and that God and everything in the universe is in change or "process". Self-determination plays a large role in the world. God maintains a mysterious component, but moves the world toward “completion” or “good” in ways not understood. Process theology is compatible with modern science.

One's God theology is not the only key to one's view of modern science. The belief about the role of the Bible in one's religion also plays a key role. Two polar views are common today:

a) The Bible is to be taken literally and is the infallible Word of God. This viewpoint makes reconciliation with modern science difficult since the entire Bible is written by men during the Bronze and Iron Ages when almost no modern science was known.
b) The Bible is to be best understood metaphorically and understood in terms of the time when it was written. This viewpoint leaves room for building a compatibility between science and religion.
 
The Miracle - The Modern Story of Creation
PDF Print E-mail
Articles

Ernie Stokely, August 3, 2008

Preface and Disclaimer

Much of the material presented here is from Brian Swimme and Thomas Berry’s book, The Universe Story.(1) In places I have quoted or nearly quoted sentences from Swimme’s book without using quotation marks. Another Brian, Brian Greene, has written a book on string theory (2) that I found interesting but so complicated its contribution to my understanding of my world was increased only incrementally. There are a number of books on Einstein’s theories, but I have not included them in the references. A third book by Casare Emiliani (3), a text for a college undergraduate course, is an excellent reference for understanding the cosmology and geology of the developing earth. Finally, the story I will paraphrase as told by Swimme and Berry stirs the spirit and calls us out of self-centeredness. No writer has spoken to “creation spirituality” more powerfully than Matthew Fox (4).

Today,we speak of The Miracle, not “a” miracle, or the “greatest” miracle, but The Miracle".

Our Heritage

Let us begin with a story from our own heritage. Try for a moment to shut out all that you know, all that is around you. Take yourself back to a time and a place where there is no science, no mathematics, no technology other than bronze implements, a time when even writing is in its infancy.

Imagine yourself 3,000 years ago, sitting around a campfire somewhere in what is now southern Israel. The heavens above blaze with stars and constellations, all with names and stories attached to them. Have you seen the skies out West on a cold, clear winter night? The heavens around our campfire are even brighter, and the Milky Way, our own galaxy, seems so near one could almost reach up and pluck the stars right out of the sky.

All eyes in the circle around the campfire turn to the elder, who is about to once again recite the story we already know by heart. We all nod as he tells the old story once again.

Creation“In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a mighty wind swept over the face of the waters. Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness Night. And there was evening, and there was morning, the first day.” The story goes on. The elder continues the story that chronicles the creation of life on earth, and the creation of man and woman. [1]

We all look to the bright night sky and are at the same time puzzled, yet comforted, by this story of how everything, including us, came to be. We have memorized this story since we were young children and were allowed to sit around the fire with the adults.

It was about 500 years later that this story was recorded as written history by an unknown writer and passed by way of the Hebrew tradition to become the creation myth for the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religions. There are so many creation myths, each different for the different human cultures. Common creation motifs include the fractionation of the things of the world from a primordial chaos; the separation of the mother and father gods; land emerging from an infinite and timeless ocean; and creation out of nothing.

The New Story

Now let us return to the 21st century, a time when we live in a world of science. This story is based on what we know today. Surely, the story will change as we learn more. It is unlikely, however, that large pieces of this basic understanding of cosmology will be rewritten in the future. Although large and significant segments of mankind today still reject the Age of Enlightenment in favor of ancient myths, the world of everyone around this table this morning is a world steeped in education and scientific understanding. Is it time for us to celebrate a new creation story for our time? Let us assume the table we are all sitting around is our 21st century campfire. Join me as we explore the wonder and the miracle of creation told in 21st century terms.

In the beginning of the universe we live in, as far as we know today, there was nothing. There was no void, no vacuum … there was not even space and time! About 15 billion years ago, all the energy and matter that would ever exist in our universe erupted as a single quantum – a singular gift – existence. In a singular event, there was a rapid expansion of unimaginable power and heat that gave birth to the universe we live in today.

In the beginning there was no time, so there can be no talk of observing the event. Further, there was no space, so there was no “outside” to this cataclysmic explosion of energy, no way to imagine being outside it and observing what it looked like. In the first second all the fundamental particles that form every atom in each of our bodies, every particle of matter in this room, every star in every galaxy in our universe, everything … was formed from the immense energy and expansion. In those first few brand-new seconds of this thing we know and take for granted called “time”, particles appeared and vanished though a process physicists call “annihilation,” vanished from the universe forever into the darkness of cosmic evolution never to appear again. By the time this process was complete, only one billionth of the original matter in the universe remained. This tiny sliver of the primordial universe managed to slide through this eye of the needle near the beginning of time and thus entered a new state of being. In those first few seconds of the birth of our universe, the laws of physics that we know today became permanent. As far as we know, they have not changed with time and do not change in other parts of our universe.

Several hundred thousand years passed and the fireball cooled enough that hydrogen and helium could form the very first atoms. At that early time there was no oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, gold, silicon, or the any of the other heavier atoms that make up our periodic chart today. The universe had cooled and become dark, transformed into a trillion clouds of the only two atoms in that early universe, hydrogen and helium.

As the universe continued to expand, the space between the clouds increased, but the clouds remained intact because of the mutual attraction of the atoms in each cloud (in just this past year we have learned that mysterious “dark matter” likely played a role in this attraction). The clouds swirled and attracted one another, slowly but inevitably forming dense structures that eventually burst into nuclear flame. These were the first stars. At this point, we are one billion years from the singular springing forth of our universe.

Let us pause for a second and consider what is happening. The laws of physics governing the interaction of matter (we know today as the weak force, the strong force, the electromagnetic force, and gravity) that were established in the first seconds after the formation of the universe are peculiarly perfect for creating the universe we know today. If the expansion rate had been slightly slower, the entire universe would have imploded, perhaps starting the process of expansion all over again. But, there would be no stars formed, no planets, no earth, and no life. If the expansion rate had been only slightly faster, the galactic clouds would have failed to form, and again, there would be no stars, no planets, and no world as we know it today. The expansion rate appears to have been just right.

As an aside, consider that we don’t know how many of these creation-of-the-universe experiments have taken place. Is ours the first? Or, is ours just one of many throughout eternity, one that worked to provide the right ingredients for the formation of the universe we observe and evolved in? We just don’t know.

Hubble Deep Field ImageAs the chaos of swirling, galactic gas clouds continued, a wondrous process began. Stars began to burn the hydrogen in a nuclear fission process. As the hydrogen was burned up, the stars turned to the burning of helium. In the intense heat and pressure at the core of the star, heavier elements like iron, silicon, etc., were formed through nuclear fusion. As some of these stars burned out, they were large enough they became a supernova. Under the incredibly intense pressure of its collapsing core, a supernova explodes and spews out into space its burned out contents … the iron, silicon, sulfur, and lead … all of the heavier elements needed to form new heavenly bodies.

All of this debris from an exploding supernova, the mother star, soars into space as the dying star sheds her corpse to provide the raw materials for new forms, new planets, new moons, new solar systems, and the eventual development of life itself. Because of the physical laws of the universe, these bodies are all bonded to one another in a cosmic waltz, each following the spacetime laws that we have understood for a scant 100 years, thanks to Albert Einstein. Our Earth dances around the Sun in a whirling, predictable path that is governed by the same physical laws that were laid down one second after the beginning of the expansion of the universe. While it seems accidental that Earth became the biophysical planet in our solar system, it is almost certain that somewhere in the vast universe there would be planets like Earth that harbor life. When given the chance, the universe will organize itself into complex and persistent patterns of activity. Earth was the chance the solar system got. Earth became the gateway into a new and thrilling epoch of the universe story.

milky way infrared imageBrian Swimme gives a name to our progenitor supernova, calling her “Tiamat”, the name for the Babylonian goddess of primordial chaos. When Tiamat, our mother star, exploded 4.6 billion years ago, she birthed the Earth’s solar system with her debris. About 4.5 billion years ago our Sun, a modest star in the Milky Way[3] galaxy, sprang to life. 4.45 billion years ago our earth was formed, bringing forth an atmosphere, oceans, and continents. Everything in our bodies and all matter on the earth is nothing more than reformed star dust from our mother, Tiamat. Our universe repeats this beautiful process over and over. It disseminates matter in a seemingly chaotic fashion, and then reforms the matter in a self-organizing way to create new entities. These are in turn eventually broken down and the process begins all over again. (2)

Such developments are recognized by some now as part of a process of “emergence”, the mysterious process that seems to come into play at every scale from the quantum to the cosmic. New creations emerge from the tiny parts, and each larger creation has properties not evident in any of the parts. For example, water has marvelous properties not seen in either hydrogen or oxygen. Snow flakes have properties not seen in water, etc. Some would say that “the whole is more than the sum of its parts,” or other put it this way: “Something else from nothing but.” Every part of the universe is permeated with self-organizing, emergent dynamics in latent form. Brian Swimme says, “These ordering patterns hide until the material structures and free energy of the region reach that particular complexity and intensity capable of drawing such patterns forth.” We will hear more from the concept called “emergence” in the coming years.

Life

Cesare Emiliani, in his text, Planet Earth: Cosmology, Geology, and the Evolution of Life and Environment, says in his chapter on the origin of life:

“People are awed by life. Some call it “unique”. Many call it “a miracle”. All are puzzled and bewildered by it. Indeed, there is excellent cause for bewilderment – life, as we know it today, is the end product of 15 billion years of cosmic and terrestrial evolution and therefore is utterly complex. We see a fantastic machine with billions of moving parts, a machine that has been fine-tuned by nature to the utmost degree – and we are bewildered. I hope, however, that this book will convince you that, far from being a miracle, life is a necessary and inevitable consequence of the way the world originated and evolved. Indeed, the origin and evolution of life on Earth were foregone conclusions right from the beginning, given the mass, the chemical composition, and the physical and astronomical parameters of our planet.”

Primoidial EarthOne blazing hot day on earth 4 billion years ago, after trillions of failed chemical experiments, in the rich soup of water and gases on primordial Earth[4], warmed by the sun and receiving energy from a violent lightning storm and from chemical interchanges, something utterly remarkable happened. The self-organizing powers of the processes on Earth came together to create the first life, an early replicating molecule that would be modified and shaped by evolutionary processes to eventually become the first prokaryotic (non-nucleated) cell (these were likely primitive viruses). Earth would never be the same again.

The process called mutation played an indispensible role in the development of life. One of the many life forms that appeared around 4 billion years ago was a cell that somehow discovered how to convert photons of light from the sun into energy. Capturing solar energy zipping into the cell at the speed of light, the cell was able to invent the biochemical machinery to convert nitrogen in the air into proteins for feeding itself. Modern-day animals (including humans) have still not mastered the trick of converting nitrogen in the air into the proteins required for their existence. We still rely on plants for this job. All mammalian food chains have plants at the bottom. Early plants flowered forth with many different forms, each tossed out into the great adventure to see what might come of them. They all entered existence.

An aside: The complexity of modern plants (they have over two times the number of genes as humans) continues to challenge the understanding of 21st century science.

Blue-green AlgaeNow, the evolutionary processes then took a turn. Early blue-green bacteria satisfied their hydrogen needs from the waters of the oceans[5]. They cleaved a water molecule to produce hydrogen, releasing the oxygen into the atmosphere. Oxygen, one of the most reactive elements, transformed the primordial atmosphere, and disrupted the environment for the earliest life forms that had developed in the early atmosphere of ammonia, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen sulfide. In the next two billion years, the first cells either developed defense mechanisms against oxygen, learned to exploit it, or they became extinct, becoming a distant footnote in the relentless evolutionary course of life on Earth.

Ozone built up in the upper atmosphere, filtering out the most energetic rays from the Sun. Once again, the self-organizing patterns of creation played out their wondrous influences, and symbiotic cell life evolved. Interconnected life forms appeared and flourished in the shallow oceans, now protected from the killing ultraviolet rays of the Sun. The rhythms of life of these creatures had evolved to enmesh with each other as they shared the environment, each taking resources unneeded by the other, each providing an element to the environment required by the other.

About 1 billion years ago a cell invented sexual reproduction, a major step forward in the creation of new life forms. Sexual reproduction ensured that both mating cells will possess the advanced and defining characteristics of the lineage. This powerful preservation of lines of creativity led to the emergence of the multicellular organism, another major step toward the evolution of higher forms of life. Only 700 million years ago, the first multicellular animal appeared. (1)

AfarensisNow we are almost 14 billion years from the springing forth, almost to our modern times. Dinosaurs flourished about 235 million years ago, and it was only 216 million years ago that the very first mammal appeared. Our recent ancestors, the monkeys, appeared 36 million years ago. The first humans, homo habilis, using stone tools, appeared about 2.6 million years ago[6]. Early forms of our species, homo sapiens, appeared a scant 200,000 years ago. Our language appeared about 40,000 years ago, and 18,000 years ago we left cave paintings in Europe.

We tamed dogs 10,000 years ago; tamed cattle 8,800 years ago, Sumeria in Mesopotamia arose about 7,000 years ago, and we settled Europe 5,000 years ago. About 3,000 years ago civilizations were arising along the Indus, Nile, and Tigris-Euphrates valleys, the time of our narrative creation story recited at the beginning of our time together this morning.

The New “Ecozoic” Age

Coal ashSince the beginning of human civilization, which was extremely recent in geological terms (only about 3,500 years ago), the impact of homo sapiens on our planet has been stunning. Hundreds of millions of years have elapsed during the evolution of the world we know today … the plants, animals, and the land and waterscape of our modern earth. Yet, in this scant 3,500 years, forests have been consumed, water and the air polluted[7], and now the climate is being modified with uncertain future consequences. Modern man has not understood the 21st century creation story. We have lived as if the earth were an inexhaustible resource to be consumed without end. Man does not see himself as an integrated and connected creature to all of the other animals and ecological systems on the planet. In the developed societies our technologies, the fruits of our large cerebral cortex, have focused on the production of material goods, instruments for higher and higher levels of consumption, and devices and systems for human pleasure and comfort. We find less developed societies emulating the more prosperous ones, exacerbating the damage to the planet. Our planet and its environment have paid the price. On the other hand, our social systems, still young and developing, reflect the greed of our species and the immaturity of our ability to design Iraqi Boysustainable social structures or even for our tribes to live together in harmony. In many ways these systems are broken, reflecting our near-sighted desire for power, material goods, comfort, and our primitive paranoia and fear of those outside our tribe[8]. As a species, we have yet to respond to the call for a more comprehensive understanding of our place in the order of the universe and a more thoughtful design for our population growth and our life styles.

Perhaps our large brain will grasp the real understanding of how to live fully and joyfully during our brief dance on earth, and that there are social systems less destructive than the ones we have now that can protect and even enhance this beautiful earth that has been placed in our trust. Or, perhaps it will not. Perhaps as our species passes into the darkness of the evolutionary process, as it sooner or later must, we will realize that we ourselves have hastened our own demise. Or, perhaps we will not. (3)

For me, the modern 21st century creation story I have shared today is far more powerful and awe-inspiring than the ancient myth I grew up knowing. It grounds me with the experience that I belong to the earth and to its ongoing evolution. It reminds me that evolution did not happen at some point in the past, but rather that evolution is happening now. It tells me that I am connected to all that is, all that is past, and all that is to come. I am connected to all of the integrated systems of the earth … the air, the water, the plants, and the animals. It pulls me out of my day-to-day existence … my worry about my health, my worries about my garden and my stock portfolio … to remind me that I am an integral part of life on this earth, a mammal with a large brain that gives me advantage over the other animals of the planet. Yet, I am sharply reminded that I came from the earth and the oceans, that the substance of my body will return there, and that in the meantime I have a responsibility to care for the part of the evolving universe I have been gifted to experience.

The creation and on-going evolution of the universe, the experience of my very existence, my awareness of being, is The Miracle. There can be no greater miracle.

In the words of my good friend, Phillip Huckaby, in his writing, Miracles or No?,

“Finally, I see miracles in another sense. I say this not for the sake of argument, but because it is my deepest held conviction, and I live by it. The fact that anything exists is a miracle. I don’t think we realize what it means that there is something instead of nothing. I am alive. I exist. You are alive. You exist. What an incredible reality! What a wonderful mystery! What a gift beyond explanation!”

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References:

  1. “The Universe Story: From the Primordial Flaring Forth to the Ecozoic Era: A Celebration of the Unfolding of the Cosmos,” Brain Swimme and Thomas Berry, Harper, NY, NY, 1992.
  1. “The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory,” Brian R. Greene, ISBN 0-393-05858-1, 2003.
  1. “Planet Earth: Cosmology, Geology, and the Evolution of Life and Environment,” Cesare Emiliani, ISBN 0-521-40123-2, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1992.
  1. “Original Blessing,” Matthew Fox, ISBN 1-58542-067-0, Penguin Putnam, New York, 1983.
  1. Genomic factoids:
  • There are 3.2 billion “base pairs” in the human genome, yet there are over 4,000 known diseases that are caused by an error in a single base pair.
  • Housed along each chromosome is a selection of genes. The human genome contains about 20 000-25 000 genes, as do most mammals.
  • Plants have 40,000-50,000 genes, mice also have about 20,000 genes; in the nematode (C. elegans), the number is around 19 000; in yeast (S. cerevisiae) there are approximately 6,000 genes; and the microbe responsible for tuberculosis has around 4,000.
  • 97% of the human genome does not code for a protein and we are just now beginning the process of understanding the function of this part of the genome.
  • Between humans, our DNA differs by only 0.2 per cent, or 1 in 500 bases (letters). (This takes into account that human cells have two copies of the genome.)
  • Human DNA is 99.1 per cent identical to chimpanzees.
  1. Cosmic factoids:

Our galaxy, the Milky Way, a modest galaxy as galaxies go, is over 100,000 light years across. (Note 1-9-2009 Very recently releases data suggest that our Milky Way is in fact a large galaxy rather than a more modest one as was previously thought). That is the distance light would travel going at 186,000 miles per second in 100,000 years! In our galaxy, the Milky Way, there are estimated to be over 400 billion stars. Yet, there are 125 billion galaxies in the observable universe. This means there are over 5,000 billion billion estimated stars in the observable universe, more stars than there are grains of sand on all the beaches on the entire planet Earth!

3.   Restoring damage from the last 100 years

Brian Swimme has remarked that if we stopped our current damage to the ecosystem with its rapid extinction of species, it would take another 10 million years for the earth to replenish and evolve new species to replace those lost in the last 100 years. (see the interview with Brian Swimme at: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5414889156623608171



[3] Early picture of the Milky Way galaxy seen from the side: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way

[8] Picture of wounded boy from Iraqi War at Web site: http://www.chris-floyd.com/war/

 
Spirituality vs. Religion
PDF Print E-mail
Articles

Spirituality Compared to Religion

Although often used interchangeably and containing similarities, these two terms are not the same. Both religion and spirituality are ways we can orient ourselves toward the Divine. Furthermore, both religion and spirituality offer a sense of purpose, meaning and a direction to life. There are also many differences.

•   Religion exists within a structured organization. Spirituality is free of any organization.
•   Spirituality can find expression in or through religion, or it can find expression outside of religious structure. Religion exists solely within a formalized structure.
•   Religion uses a hierarchy of leadership to guide one to what is holy. Spirituality is based on a direct one-to-one relationship with God.
•   Religion adheres to ancient texts and mythological stories as the source of truth. Spirituality is open to a constant flow of new insights in truth through our individual consciousness.
•   Religion adheres to a materialist worldview. Spirituality affirms an ultimate unseen reality that is knowable through our evolving consciousness.
•   Religion is grounded in dogma and doctrine that determines what is to be believed. Spirituality is universal in nature and is open to individual discovery.
•   Religion is exclusive in nature and open primarily to people of that faith or belief. Spirituality is inclusive and is open to people of all faiths or no religious faith at all.
•   In religion, the divine is clearly defined, personified and named. In spirituality, the divine is an indefinable presence or spirit within each individual and is also an omnipresent reality throughout all of creation.